MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Joint Meeting with Building Authority
January 11, 2006
Present:
Building Authority:
Others:
MINUTES
Motion by
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
There was no public input.
LIBRARY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Construction Manager,
M. Paulus responded it is their intentions to have it completed by the 14th of February; noting that the biggest part left is to install the flooring for the main lobby and workers are holding off on this until furniture and the Bay City Branch collection has been moved in.
CONSTRUCTION INVOICES
Construction Invoices and Transfer of Monies to the County - Kevin Ayala stated the construction invoices for certificate #43 total $940,814.86. The amount to be transferred to the County is $364,784. H. Wetters asked if these invoices contained any of the disputed items for the winter conditions, contaminated soil or legal fees. K. Ayala responded that they do not.
Motion by
PROJECT FINANCIAL REPORTS
Construction Project Expense Summary
Construction Budget, Estimates and GMP Summary
Capital Campaign Summary Report
Motion by
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Sage Branch Library Steps – SME report
Auburn Branch Library Insulation – M. Paulus stated that the additional insulation work at the Auburn Branch Library was completed on December 28, 2005. He noted that an email notification was sent to both Steve List and the architect that this work had been completed and it was also mentioned at the Construction Progress meeting. S. List will accompany the architect to inspect this work to be certain it has been done as M. Paulus has stated.
NEW BUSINESS
Copy Machine Bid Award – K. Ayala explained bids were sent out for four copy machines at Wirt Library and the recommendation is to award all four machines to one vendor. This would allow for ease in maintenance of the machines as there will only be one company to call for service, etc. The budget for purchasing these machines was at $20,000 and the bid from IKON came in under budget at $19,057. Staff recommends purchasing these machines from IKON Office Solutions. He shared that there will be a yearly maintenance agreement at a cost of $990 per year, which will include travel time, parts, and supplies. This agreement will be renewed on a yearly basis. J. Davison asked if staff looked into leasing machines instead of purchasing them out right. K. Ayala responded that on this bid he did not; noting that the money to purchase them was part of the Technology budget for Wirt Library. J. Davison added his experience with leasing copy machines included the cost of maintenance making it cheaper to lease instead of purchasing them along with an added cost for maintenance. K. Ayala responded that the copy machine used at the Administration Office is leased but the maintenance agreement is separate from the lease agreement as it is based on the number of copies made. The Library pays on an annual basis $3,600 for the lease agreement on the one copier and over a period of 10 years, it would be cheaper to purchase the machines and pay only for a maintenance agreement based on number of copies. K. Ayala responded to H. Wetters’ question on the function of each of these copiers, noting that three of the four copiers are for the public; two to perform only black and white copying while the third is for color copying as well. All three machines are coin operated. The fourth machine for staff will be networked to all staff computers and will offer scanning capabilities, black and white copying, etc.
Motion by H. Wetters, seconded by
Roll call: D. Adcock – yes; J. Davison – yes; M. Kaplenski – yes; H. Wetters – yes; and
E.
Microfilm Reader Bid award – K. Ayala explained there will be four microfilm readers, four printers and four stands for the readers. There were four bids sent out, with only two returned. Staff is recommending awarding the bid to Graphic Sciences for a total cost of $28,753 for all equipment and $2,660 for a yearly maintenance agreement. The maintenance agreement includes travel and parts but not supplies; these would be purchased separately as needed. In response to
Motion by
OTHER
Winter Conditions – H. Wetters commented there are change orders for Winter Conditions that have been tabled for further discussion. He is making a formal request of Skanska to be assured the Library board will receive copies of all original bid proposals that were bid and accepted by Skanska as part of the project; all of the details down to load slips, time slips, everything involved. The sooner this material is turned over for review, the quicker both boards can make a determination on the change orders. In addition, he renewed his request made over a month ago at a Construction Progress meeting, to supply to the board information regarding the $36,000 clean up issue for materials that were hauled off site. He had asked M. Paulus well over a month ago for a map detailing where the soil was removed from, which he has not received yet. If this dirt has come from the jail property, it would actually have implications for the expenses currently in dispute with the County.
H. Wetters asked M. Paulus if any of the construction bids they have accepted contain winter conditions. M. Paulus deferred this question to Stephanie Corona who responded they did not, which is why Skanska only gave an allowance as it is always uncertain as to what sort of winter there will be. If it would be included and ended up not being necessary, Skanska would not be able to recoup the cost. It is set up in this manner to bill after the season, keeping track of the charges for winter conditions and paying them after the season. H. Wetters verified that as a contractor not being asked to bid winter conditions that Skanska is the entity that is authorized to keep track of them. S. Corona confirmed this and added that Skanska also review the quotes and time tickets to make certain that what is being submitted is equal to what is on the time tickets. She noted that there were some disputes with the time tickets which were submitted back to the contractors. She added that it takes a great deal of time to verify these costs. H. Wetters stated he is aware there are contractors who have submitted invoices for winter conditions as far back as September of 2004. She concurred and noted these are the invoices in question. He noted that the boards did not receive these invoices until 2005.
M. Paulus asked for verification of H. Wetters’ request of material. H. Wetters responded he is looking specifically for time and materials and how it would be charged; the percentage of overhead that could be added on changes, in essence he is looking for the parameters of the contract over these types of items. It is apparent that for the entire amount of the charges for winter conditions the boards are looking at times and materials and overage. M. Paulus will supply this information.
Letter to
Artwork displayed at Wirt Library –
Plan for wall hangings in Administration Area at Wirt Library –
Managing Library and Assistant Director Position – E.
In regards to the Assistant Director position, this was posted internally with the requirement on a Masters in Library Science. Kevin Ayala, who has a Masters in Business Administration, was the only response. Unless the Library decides to repost and broaden the position to include those with other Master’s Degrees, the only other recourse is to advertise through out
Coffee Shop for Wirt Library –
Grand Opening for the
INFORMATION ITEMS
Audit Schedule for 2006 –
ANNOUNCEMENT
Change in meeting date –
H. Wetters stated that he was never contacted regarding the change of the meeting; only after it was reschedule was he aware of the date change. He said that because of the Library’s scheduled meetings on specific Wednesdays, he typically leaves the others opened and consequently has a work related meeting scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on the 18th and will not be able to attend the Library board meeting, now scheduled for the same time. He would appreciate it if changes are going to be made from the established dates for Library board meetings that all trustees are contacted to determine whether they would have the alternate time available. He believes that as the Library Board meetings are scheduled a year in advance, trustees should be available for them but if there cannot be a quorum, all trustees should be asked for their schedule to determine a new time. Based on the Library Board meeting schedule, he typically always has a work related meeting on the third Wednesday of the month. E. J. Martini assured him she did contact all board members, leaving a message at H. Wetters’ office to return her call but he did not. H. Wetters responded that she may have contacted his office but there was no voicemail from her nor was there a written note from any of his staff, of which they are in the habit of always doing, that she had called at all. M. Kaplenski asked if H. Wetters received the same email notification that he did. He responded that he did but it was a notification that the meeting had already been rescheduled. M. Kaplenski apologized as the change was initiated by him as he would be out of town on the 25th. E. J. Martini added there were two other trustees that also were not available and there would not have been a quorum. H. Wetters’ point is that he had not been contacted for his availability; that the meeting did not necessarily have to be scheduled on a Wednesday. The typical process would have been to call all board members for their availability to determine the new date.
As H. Wetters will not be able to attend the Library Board meeting on the 18th , he requested that the change orders that are pending regarding the winter conditions and contaminated soil, not be discussed without him being present.
Motion by
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________ ___________________________
Derald Adcock
Secretary/Treasurer Recording Secretary